Re: xpcom/gtkmozembed modules flags for tinymail
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: Alexander Sack <asac jwsdot com>
- Cc: Alexander Sack <asac canonical com>, Loïc Minier <lool dooz org>, Steve Kowalik <steve kowalik canonical com>, tinymail-devel-list gnome org, Dirk-Jan Binnema <Dirk-Jan Binnema nokia com>
- Subject: Re: xpcom/gtkmozembed modules flags for tinymail
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:21:49 +0100
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:52 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 07:55:52PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I think openssl would be a licensing issue because its incompatible
> with GPL. Do you just use standard features that could easily make use
> of gnutls?
That's why the default is to use NSS. A port of the OpenSSL code to
GnuTLS's OpenSSL-wrap is planned.
> > We have a very interesting bug in NSS/NSPR by the way. The coredump of
> > our tester regretfully revealed few information. Other than these
> > stacktraces.
>
> Do you have a testcase or steps on how to reproduce?
Regretfully we don't have this. This happened on the device of a user
who left his session running in IDLE for a night, after the crash the
application restarted automatically and the problem reoccurred
consistently. I don't know whether the problem still occurs now (I
should ask the tester about it).
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]