Re: Patch to improve priority flags management

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:02 +0200, jfernandez wrote:
> Hi, 
> I tried to implement a bit improvement of priority flags definition. 
> A single flag replace the old 3 flags HIGH, NORMAL, LOW. This new flag will
> be called PRIORITY_FLAGS and will be set to 1<<10|1<<9 to be used as bit mask.
> 
> A new enumeration is defined, TnyHeaderPriorityFlags, with all available priority
> levels. 

If this works for you, and if it's more easy to handle (from an API
perspective) than the current way of interpreting the flags, then you
can commit this.

We'll further discuss it on IRC if needed.