[system-tools]Re: Proposal for a new g-c-c menu layout for GNOME 2.8
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: Carlos Garnacho <garnacho tuxerver net>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, system-tools-list gnome org
- Subject: [system-tools]Re: Proposal for a new g-c-c menu layout for GNOME 2.8
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:30:32 +0800
On 26/03/04 08:22, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a proposal for a new control center menu layout, my main
objectives are to allow an easier integration of "external" apps into
the g-c-c and to somewhat avoid the growing clutter in the menu.
my proposal (+ several screenshots to explain it) are in
http://www.ultimaorbita.com/~garnacho/control-center-proposal/
There's still no definitive patch for it, but I'll attach one when we
arrive to a definitive solution. Any thoughts, opinions, flames?
The main problem with the design is that it is a move back to the bad
old days for the preferences menu. Rather than drilling down two levels
of menus to get to the common control panels (which some people think is
one too many), your design would require going through three levels of
menus to get to any control panel at all. It also makes it easier for
people to add lots of extra control panels to the tree, which most
people don't see as a benefit.
On the subject of where to put things like gnome-system-tools under
preferences, what are the benefits of doing this as opposed to having a
separate tree? (eg. "System Settings" as on Fedora/Red Hat) A boot
loader configuration tool doesn't sound like the sort of thing I'd want
mixed in with per-user settings. As multi-user systems become more
common, I'd think separating out the global and per-user settings would
be a good thing. (eg. Windows XP prompts you to enter the names of all
the users who will be using the machine during install and sets up
accounts for them).
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]