Re: Uri for local configuration database



On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:30, Seth Nickell wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:40, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > What URI do you think we should use for local configuration ? There is
> > not an host name ... Would something like storage:///id be ok ? (I have
> > no idea on how vfs modules work).
> 
> Yes, and storage:/// should work currently I think, but it might be
> stupid and just use default values if I never cleaned that part up.
> 

There was still a FIXME about it ... I check in a fix for it, now
test-storage pass completely.
Maybe we can use store/query_maker there at some point and avoid code
duplication.

Marco




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]