Re: Code style
- From: Marco Pesenti Gritti <marco gnome org>
- To: sinzui cox net
- Cc: storage <storage-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Code style
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 01:00:39 -0400
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:54, Curtis C. Hovey wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 00:48, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:34, Curtis C. Hovey wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 14:17, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > > > I know this isnt exactly a very important/urgent issue but I'd like we
> > > > could choose a code style for storage.
> > > > Right now it's a mix of different styles. A coherent code style make
> > > > sources more readable for me ...
> > > > I dont think we should fix all our code to follow the style now, just
> > > > write new code using it and fixup pieces of the old gradually. (for
> > > > example when making changes in a func ...).
> > > >
> > > > So I propose we just use nautilus guidelines, as they are quite sane and
> > > > much of current code seem to be mostly following them.
> > > > http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/nautilus/docs/style-guide.html
> > > >
> > > > If you agree I can add a note about it in the HACKING file.
> > > > Let me know.
> > >
> > > I agree with following the Nautilus standard...but that document is not
> > > the working Nautilus style guide. I know this because it does not
> > > include the revision to the local variable declaration rule.
> > >
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2003-May/msg00001.html
> >
> > Are you sure that change has ever been decided ? Jeff in that thread
> > points out that it would not work on gcc < 3.
> > The document I linked is in nautilus cvs head, not sure where to search
> > for a more updated one.
>
> I'm sure.
Ok, I'll just remove that rule when putting it in cvs.
Marco
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]