Re: Code style

["Seth Nickell" <seth gnome org>]

In any case, sounds good to me as long as we use the "local variable 
ewxtension".

-seth

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 3:49PM -0800, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:34, Curtis C. Hovey wrote:
> >  On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 14:17, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> >  > I know this isnt exactly a very important/urgent issue but I'd like 
> > we
> >  > could choose a code style for storage.
> >  > Right now it's a mix of different styles. A coherent code style make
> >  > sources more readable for me ...
> >  > I dont think we should fix all our code to follow the style now, 
> > just
> >  > write new code using it and fixup pieces of the old gradually. (for
> >  > example when making changes in a func ...).
> >  >
> >  > So I propose we just use nautilus guidelines, as they are quite 
> > sane and
> >  > much of current code seem to be mostly following them.
> >  > http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/nautilus/docs/style-guide.html
> >  >
> >  > If you agree I can add a note about it in the HACKING file.
> >  > Let me know.
> >
> >  I agree with following the Nautilus standard...but that document is 
> > not
> >  the working Nautilus style guide.  I know this because it does not
> >  include the revision to the local variable declaration rule.
> >
> >  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2003-May/msg00001.html
>
> Are you sure that change has ever been decided ? Jeff in that thread
> points out that it would not work on gcc < 3.
> The document I linked is in nautilus cvs head, not sure where to search
> for a more updated one.
>
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Storage-list mailing list
> Storage-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-list
-Seth