Re: [Shotwell] Dealing with large photo collections - start-up time



I just checked the sqlite tables and I only have a couple dozen comments, the longest of which is about 200 
characters.

Is there a way to get a better idea of what Shotwell is doing when I start it?

While looking around in the db I do notice that I have a value in the TagTable.photo_id_list column that is 
almost 26000 characters long. 


On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 04:44 +0000, Brian Masney wrote:
Do you happen to have a large amount of data in your event or photo
comment fields? I have a library with 17K photos and Shotwell was
taking
several minutes to start. A few months ago, I found the cause of the
problem to be my large event comments. The attached patch disables
searching by event comment but it makes Shotwell start with my
library
in under 3 seconds.

I planned to submit a bug report once I had a correct patch ready to
fix
the issue.

Brian



On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 07:52:51PM -0400, a.gnome wrote:
I have about 23K photo files going back to 1999 under Shotwell's
management.  Even on an SSD,  it takes about 90 seconds for
Shotwell to
become responsive after starting up, which sometimes makes it
pretty
painful to use.

What strategies have you used to deal with large collections of
photos,
while ensuring that all metadata (tags etc) are preserved?

I was thinking of maintaining a small "Current" library for photo
imports, initial organization, tagging, etc; and an "Archive"
library
for older photos, but foresee problems moving photos from "Current"
to
"Archive" as time goes on, especially with the metadata.

Are there plans to make Shotwell more capable when it comes to
managing
large photo libraries?
_______________________________________________
shotwell-list mailing list
shotwell-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]