Re: Major refactoring in seahorse

[Stef <stef-list memberwebs com>]

Adam Schreiber wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Stef <stef-list memberwebs com> wrote:
>>  * No more concept of mulitple names on a key, which was how we
>>   represented Uids before. These have been separate objects
>>   for a while now, but this was finalized and old code removed.
>>
>>   See: pgp/seahorse-pgp-uid.[ch] and various UID usages in pgp/
> 
> Do the UID objects carry around what their index is even if there are
> photo ids mixed in?  I think this was what was holding up the
> revoking/deleting of uids (having to parse the output of gpg).

They do carry around their UID index.

That said, the whole UID thing needs a some love. There are 1 based UIDs
and zero based UIDs all over seahorse mixed together, which causes bugs.

Perhaps it'd be nice to standardize on zero based UIDs and only convert
them to 1 based at the last minute where necessary.

What do you think?

Cheers,

Stef