Re: signingparty integration

[Stef <stef-list memberwebs com>]

Adam Schreiber wrote:
> Back in August, I posted a little C file to p.g.o [1][2] and it was
> suggested that it be included in seahorse-plugins.  I'm happy to do
> so, but there are some issues we need to discuss.  Right now, it has
> runtime dependencies on LaTeX and rubber.  Both should be available in
> most distributions, but might not be installed by most users.  Do we
> want to simply display a prompt to the user that the requisite
> packages aren't installed, or add a dependency on package-kit.  The
> problem with pkg-k is that it hasn't been proposed as a blessed
> external dependency yet and from the thread on d-d-l the other day I'm
> not sure it would be.

Would a build time dependency work? We have all sorts of optional build
time dependencies in seahorse-plugins.

Cheers,

Stef