Re: sawfish 1.6.3 can't compile sawfish.wm.util.prompt

[Christopher Roy Bratusek <zanghar freenet de>]

Am Sun, 23 May 2010 16:59:15 +0200
schrieb Christopher Roy Bratusek <zanghar freenet de>:

> Am Sun, 23 May 2010 09:41:59 -0500
> schrieb Jeremy Hankins <nowan nowan org>:
> 
> > Harald van Dijk <harald gigawatt nl> writes:
> > > [...]
> > > (compiling sawfish/wm/util/ping.jl)
> > > (compiling sawfish/wm/util/prompt.jl)
> > > error--> (void-value prompt-completion-fun)
> > > make[1]: *** [lisp] Error 10
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harald/sawfish/lisp'
> > > make: *** [all] Error 1
> > >
> > > This file is unchanged from 1.6.2, but as of commit
> > > 2277ff2ca26ea48fd6ce96f45faa4971a52bc81a
> > > <http://git.gnome.org/browse/sawfish/commit/?id=2277ff2ca26ea48fd6ce96f45faa4971a52bc81a>
> > > ,sawfish.wm.util.prompt is no longer implicitly included when compiling
> > > itself. Note that you will not see this error if you are working from
> > > a previous build directory where the .jlc files already exist. I
> > > noticed the build completes without errors or warnings if I simply
> > > remove the "Compilation hack" block; is it still necessary? If it is
> > > necessary, another way to fix the problem is by having
> > > sawfish.wm.util.prompt explicitly (open) itself.
> > 
> > I haven't been able to replicate this, and it doesn't make a whole lot
> > of sense to me.  A file shouldn't have to be opened from itself in order
> > to compile it, and I can't see where a (setq foo bar) would generate a
> > void-value error on foo.
> > 
> 
> you're right. hmm… 
> 

O.K. I've reverted the changes. I didn't know that `git revert' does *not* require a
push… so that's why the log looks strange (…) but everythings fine.

Chris

-- 

Re: Recht hat der Mann
Gesendet von Geek am Di, 30. Jun um 12:55

Stallmann ist einfach nur penetrat, ungepflegt und dick. RMS - Nein, Danke.

  Re[2]: Recht hat der Mann
  Gesendet von TherealPartykracher am Di, 30. Jun um 12:57

  Niemand hat gesagt, dass du mit RMS ins Bett steigen sollst
  (er wäscht sich seine Füße nicht sagt man), seine Aussage zählt
  hier und die ist in meinen Augen vollkommen korrekt.