Re: To sawfish from metacity?
- From: Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>
- To: sawfish-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: To sawfish from metacity?
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:03:55 +0900 (JST)
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:26:19 -0500 (CDT), Dale Huckeby wrote:
> Would it be better to compile sawfish with gnome already installed?
Today, no, but it may change.
> Is sawfish-config part of the base sawfish package?
> Would it be better to compile librep and rep-gtk than install rpms
> if I'm going to compile the sawfish package?
Depends on the version. Anyway, when you compile, Sawfish checks
the versions of librep and rep-gtk, and emits an error message if
they aren't new enough, so it's a good idea to try rpm first.
We know that our Wiki is poor, but sorry, even so it's after much
effort. Instead (??), don't hesitate to ask things here. But can you
make it concise, emphasizing the point? (What is 'kentucky game'? :)
> I was originally hoping to find, a step-by-step how-to.
Sure. I want to work in this point, but after *several* months. Now
I've got other things to do. (But Chris' last edit was quite
You can ignore that librep misses libffi. It's better to fix it, but
you don't need it, unless you're a dedicated librep programmer.
I hope you like Sawfish again.
Teika (Teika kazura)
] [Thread Prev