Re: keys.c hack?

[Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>]

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:42:12 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> Am Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:22:29 +0900 (JST)
> schrieb Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>:
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:10 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
>> > ;; exec true when NumLock is OFF
>> > KP_Left '(system "true &")
>> > 
>> > ;; exec true when NumLock is ON
>> > N-KP_Left '(system "true &")
>> 
>> Yes, it'll be great. (Thanks for explanation I omitted :) I meant that
>> someone else may like NumLock gets ignored, so that both KP_Left and
>> NumLock-KP_Left are treated as "KP_Left".  (This is the current
>> Sawfish.) 
> 
> X-KP_Left ? or NI-KP_Left ?

Sorry, I don't understand your question due to lack of my X
knowledge. If it's worth discussion, could you explain it?

Thank you in advance.
Teika (Teika kazura)