Re: [ANNOUNCE] rep-gtk-0.18.4 (other scheme..)



I think im running off topic but I'm a little bit curious about 'rep': why should we maintain a scheme implementation just for this software? can we just implement sawfish upon other scheme implementation such as gnu-guile/mit-scheme or plt-scheme? that' would be a lot relaxing for maintainers.

-lars

On Sun, 03 May 2009, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:

> Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 00:40 +1000 schrieb Allan Duncan:
> > Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > a brand-new release of rep-gtk 0.18.4 is awaiting you.
> > 
> > I've been trying to compile an RPM for the latest 0.18.5 on an x64 box, and get:
> > 
> > ...
> > install -d /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rep-gtk-0.18.5-1.x86_64/usr/lib/pkgconfig/
> > install -m644 rep-gtk.pc /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rep-gtk-0.18.5-1.x86_64/usr/lib/pkgconfig/
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILD/rep-gtk-0.18.5
> > extracting debug info from 
> > /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rep-gtk-0.18.5-1.x86_64/usr/lib64/rep/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gui/gtk-2/types.so
> > extracting debug info from 
> > /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rep-gtk-0.18.5-1.x86_64/usr/lib64/rep/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gui/gtk-2/gtk.so
> > ...
> > Processing files: rep-gtk-0.18.5-1
> > error: File not found: 
> > /home/alland/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rep-gtk-0.18.5-1.x86_64/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/rep-gtk.pc
> > ...
> > 
> > The pkgconfig stuff is being placed into /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib64 that
> > everything else is going to.  I haven't worked out how the "lib64" is generated, but
> > Makefile.in has lines like "install -d $(DESTDIR)/@prefix@/lib/pkgconfig/" that aren't
> > going to deliver the lib64 needed above.
> > 
> > 
> 
> That has been fixed in trunk.
> 
> The patch can also be found in the ML (by Teika)
> 
> Chris


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]