Re: Next stable Rygel release

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Alper Guler <aguler ubicom com> wrote:
>
>>    I really don't think its fair to include the size of dependencies
>> when specifying the size of Rygel. You might as well include the size
>> of Linux kernel then.
>>
>>
>
> No offense :-)

   None taken, I was only objecting to the choice of words. :)

> My point of view is how much flash space do I need to run
> Rygel on my board and this adds the dependency sizes as well, because I
> don`t need those libraries for any other application. I will add them to my
> system just for Rygel, so I have to count them in.
> But thanks for you suggestions. I will try to optimize the size as much as
> possible by removing anything which is not really needed.

  NP, I hope you succeed. Please let me know in either case.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124