Re: DMP/DMR implementation
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: "GNOME UPnP/DLNA services" <rygel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: DMP/DMR implementation
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:03:04 +0200
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, srikanth <srikieonline yahoo com> wrote:
> I had left a comment on your blog , but then I realized thats a wrong place
> to post my query. Sorry about that!.
> 1. Is the architecture of rygel tightly couple to server implementation?
If you mean "MediaServer by server, no it's not. As i said in the
comment on my blog entry, we already have a DMR implementation.
> 2. Is it advisable to use Rygel for DMP/DMR implementation, or do you advice
> to explore option of using gUpnp directly.
I guess i already answered that too in my comment.
> 3. Can we re-use of Http request/response, connection manager etc modules in
> the dmp/dmr implementation? (I have'nt gone thru the code in depth yet).
> Basically, I need to understand how much of code re-use can be done.
Why would you need to use server-side HTTP in either DMP or DMR?
Regarding ConnectionManager, there is hardly any code to re-use. :)
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
] [Thread Prev