GNOME.org
 

Re: Roadmap-list post from sragavan novell com requires approval

Oops, forwarded the administrative message. Sorry!

--lucasr


2007/5/3, Lucas Rocha <lucasr at mundo gmail com>:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: roadmap-list-owner gnome org <roadmap-list-owner gnome org>
Date: 03/05/2007 08:22
Subject: Roadmap-list post from sragavan novell com requires approval
To: roadmap-list-owner gnome org


As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

    List:    Roadmap-list gnome org
    From:    sragavan novell com
    Subject: Re: GNOME Roadmap - Information Request for gtkhtml
    Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

    http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/admindb/roadmap-list

to approve or deny the request.


---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
From: Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
To: roadmap-list gnome org
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:51:24 +0530
Subject: Re: GNOME Roadmap - Information Request for gtkhtml
Hi,

My replies are below.

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 01:23 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> GNOME 2.18 was released ~1 month ago, and we've all started to focus
> on the next development cycle. A new roadmapping process has been
> proposed[1] to know our short-term and long-term plans. The goal is to
> compose a GNOME-wide roadmap for the next stable releases. And we need
> your help to do this. It's important that you take a few minutes to
> reply to the following questions before May 7.
>
> ----
>
> - What are your plans for GNOME 2.20 (next 4 months, before feature and
>  UI freezes)?

   No new features planned as such. Bug fixes and more memory
improvements.
>
> - What are your plans for GNOME 2.22 (next year)?
   Nothing planned yet
>
> - Do you have plans for a future release?
   Stick to GNOME release schedule.
>
> - Do you have any goals from 2.18 that were not achieved? Why?
   No.
>
> - Is there something that is really missing in our infrastructure or
>  platform that would help you?
   No
>
> - Do you have plans to work on other modules not maintained by you?
>  What are they?
   No
>
> - Do you have any GNOME-wide goals suggestions for the next releases?
   Nothing I can think of now.

-Srini.
>
> ----
>
> You can reply those questions in two ways: you can directly create a
> wiki page for your module's roadmap or you can just reply this
> message to roadmap-list gnome org > 
> To create the wiki page, follow the instructions:
>
> 1. Create a wiki page under http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/ModuleName,
> where "ModuleName" is a wiki word version of your module (i.e Gedit,
> LibGnome, GnomeVfs, etc). You can use this template for the wiki page
> initial content:
>  http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/ModuleTemplate
>
> 2. Add a link to the new page in http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Modules
> and set the status column to "Info" accordingly.
>
> ----
>
> You can keep track of the roadmapping process for your (and other)
> modules at:
>  http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Modules
>
> For more information about the roadmap process, go to:
>  http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Process
>
> For more information about our schedule, go to:
>  http://live.gnome.org/Schedule
>
> Thanks for your contribution!
>
> The Roadmap Gang
>
> [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2007-March/msg00011.html



---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
From: roadmap-list-request gnome org
To:
Date:
Subject: confirm 91d682c81d656d31beb59b52357554402744c95b
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]