Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Rhythmbox archive

[Øivind Hoel <oivind hoel gmail com>]

Which brings me to asking where Walters is hiding?

Also, I've been told the schedule for 0.10 is to make it in time for
gnome 2.12. This in mind, it would indeed be a good idea to start
committing changes from Olivers repository to the main repo. If not,
I'd like to know why this is a bad idea :)



On 5/28/05, Jaap Haitsma <jaap haitsma org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is there a reason why the rhythmbox central archive
> <http://web.rhythmbox.org/arch/2004> is so outdated? Last patch is from
> January 2005
> 
> I personally like to use jhbuild to try out bleeding edge software and
> jhbuild is currently using that outdated archive.
> 
> I know that there are multiple archives of people which contain more
> recent patches. E.g. I read overhere [1] that it was better to use
> Archive: olemke core-dump info--2005
> Branch:  rhythmbox--merge--0.9
> http://arch.core-dump.info/archive
> 
> But how do I know as a newbie which archive I should use? The above
> archive for instance is not listed on the website.
> 
> I might be missing something because I'm not so familiar with arch
> development, but I guess it will difficult to do a release now. Because
> you have all this archives with different features and patches, which
> have not been approved by the maintainer of rhythmbox.
> 
> It seems to me it would be better to commit changes faster to the main
> archive. These changes would get more testing and you don't need to
> postpone all the decisions until just before a release.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jaap
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rhythmbox-devel/2005-May/msg00148.html
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
> 


-- 
Cheers, Øivind Hoel