On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 04:01 +1000, James Livingston wrote: > I've fixed it, as part of thing I was doing anyway to clean up sorting > for Playlist-related things, but I did remove a "feature". The sorting > order used to go Ascending->Descending->Unsorted; where "Unsorted" was > whatever Rhythmbox felt like. I've changed it so it simply alternates > between ascending and descending, because I doubt anyone really used the > "whatever RB feels like" order (and it was easier not to have it there). Makes perfectly sense. > Hopefully there aren't any silly bugs I've put in, like last time. I'll > probably have a go at Playlist sorting in the next few days. Found one. :-) I always got an assert on startup because view->priv->sorting_key is NULL and passed to eel_gconf_get_string. A fix is in the merge branch patch 42. One more thing: RB remembers the sorting type on the next startup but doesn't display the corresponding arrow in the list header. Maybe it was like this before, I never payed attention to it. -- so long, oliver Public GPG Key: http://www.core-dump.info/olemke-public.asc Fingerprint: 2389 0B2C 1AA8 4E3E D5AD 3B72 00DB ABDC 73ED C558
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part