On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 22:30 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:54:15PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > > > The bonobo remote interface is about half implemented. It's in better shape > > than the dbus remote interface, though. I've started yet another branch to > > bash it into shape, and I'm pulling in Jonatan's work on the dbus remote > > interface from a while back too. I'll post details when it's ready. > > I've basically finished the reimplementation of the bonobo interface > now. The dbus interface is less complete, because coding to the > low-level dbus API isn't much fun, and the glib bindings are either not > finished yet or not in a widely-used release of dbus yet or something. > There aren't any dbus clients yet, so there's no real need to get it > working right now. > > The rhythmbox--remote--0.9 branch in my archive > (http://j.kaolin.hn.org/arch/2005) holds my continuation of Jonatan's > work, plus minimal patches from elsewhere to get it to build. > > rhythmbox-applet works, and I've checked a few of the python-based clients. > I haven't checked rbscrobbler or gaim-rhythmbox or > $your_favourite_client, though. I'll give your repo a shot with gaim-rhythmbox when I get some free time. Is the plan for 0.9 to continue with the bonobo interface primarily and then finish up dbus when the bindings mature? I was under the impression that bonobo was to be comletely ripped out in favor of dbus but that was a while ago and I haven't been following too closely. Regards, Jon Oberheide -- Jon Oberheide <jon oberheide org> GnuPG Key: 1024D/F47C17FE Fingerprint: B716 DA66 8173 6EDD 28F6 F184 5842 1C89 F47C 17FE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part