Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Jukebox playlist
- From: Seth Hadley <sethh unt edu>
- To: Thomas Lunde <tlunde mac com>, rhythmbox development <rhythmbox-devel gnome org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Jukebox playlist
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:48:40 -0400
I dug a bit in the archives, but could not find the answer:
> Colin - why do you want to get rid of Sources?
I would like to know this too, I am a big fan of the Source.
> I didn't realize that, in RB, I'd lose the Browser and the ability to
> sort by clicking on the column heads while looking at a playlist instead
> of my Library. Ugh. In iTunes, the rest of the app's functionality is
> the same whether you have selected the Library or a particular playlist
> as the Source.
>
> Do y'all take feature requests via bugzilla? ;-)
This is exactly why I don't mess with playlists in Rhythmbox. The
Library has so much more functionality. I feel like playlists are just
a list of songs in Rb, where it should be more like a subset of the
Library. There are many UI problems with playlists as you have
mentioned...where as Library is *damn close to perfect*
Another is that in playlist "Track" is replaced as the list. A huge
error in my opinion.
The playlist should have no different look-and-feel than the library.
But I am sure many will disagree.
(of course all this will change if a completely new UI approach is
implemented)
> As for a Jukebox (aka Party Shuffle) feature, I was all set to cheer on
> Gisli's prototype -- until I read Dan8827's proposal.
OK, I like Dans basic approach of having a separate Source, but If I
could be so bold, I would have it like this...
Split up into my next email (too long).
Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]