Re: Fwd: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] yet another new mockup (meta)
- From: Jorn Baayen <jorn nl linux org>
- To: James Kahn <james liet net>
- Cc: rhythmbox-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] yet another new mockup (meta)
- Date: 13 May 2003 12:48:35 +0200
tis 2003-05-13 klockan 02.13 skrev James Kahn:
> Whoops, forgot to send it to the list as well.
>
> Quoting Jorn Baayen <jorn@nl.linux.org>:
> > sön 2003-05-11 klockan 22.53 skrev James Kahn:
> > > I think Jorn's have been iteratively the best so far. If you take the
> > > UI at http://people.nl.linux.org/~jorn/d.png:
> > > - replace the shuffle button with a square action button (no text, the
> > > image would suffice I think).
> >
> > Just a CD? hmm.. not clear IMHO..
>
> An image of a CD with fire coming off it, or something like that. Even my
> mother who's whole experience with computers has been Yahoo! Mail knows what
> burning a CD is.
For CD burning it's probably qutie clear, but for more obscure meta
buttons.. hm.
>
> > > - Remove the show browser check box
> >
> > Maybe expander arrow?
>
> I'll see if I can incorporate it. The thing about this is that it *only* makes
> sense in the library view, not any of the other sources.
Well, the expander + search entry bar is there only in the library view
anyway. (If we inlcude a search entry for a group/whatever view, we
should include the browser too)
>
> > > - Put the toggle buttons "Shuffle" and "Repeat" in the same spot that
> > > the show browser check box is, with text, but with smaller images so
> > > they fit nicely in that area
> > > - Repeat shoudl probably toggle between "Repeat None", "Repeat Track"
> > > and "Repeat List".
> >
> > Yea, but then we cant use a check or a togglebutton...
>
> Hmm, true. Is there anything wrong with a button (not togglebutton) that will
> change it's text every time it's clicked? What it is currently displaying
> would be the "current state". Other than that I think a togglebutton is the
> way to go, and maybe have a pref that says if repeat means repeat track or
> repeat list?
I think that would be pretty bad, button *click* it's changed, *click*
again, and not in the standard way.. hmm.. i wonder does anyone use
repeat current song at all?
>
> > > I think that would make a very nice UI indeed. I could have a go at
> > > this if you sent me your glade for that image (Jorn?), but I won't be
> > > able to have a go at it until tonight when I get home from work and
> > > uni. It's 9am now, btw.
> >
> > I'm attaching it, good luck! :)
>
> Cheers, I'll have a play when I get home.
>
> - James.
>
> --
> James Kahn <james@liet.net>
> http://liet.net
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]