Re: Post-hoc UI freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Giovanni Campagna
<scampa giovanni gmail com> wrote:
> I'm sorry I pushed the commit before asking first, I totally forgot of
> the freeze. I'm ok with reverting if the freeze break is not accorded.
> What I'm asking the permission to implement the designs in
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682540, which is listed as
> priority 0 in https://live.gnome.org/ScreenLock/BoF.
> It consists of merging the volume, network and battery indicator in
> the lock screen in one menu.
>
> While we're there, the following bugs are open for the screen lock
> feature, and affect UI:
> - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682542 (makes the a11y
> menu reappear in the unlock dialog)
> - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682546 (shows the user
> name on the left with a padlock)
> - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682544 (replaces auth
> failed notifications with orange messages)
> - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682285 (replaces the drag
> handle with three animating arrows)
> They all have patches, so I hope they'll be finished before 3.6. I'll
> send separate requests for each of them in due time however.
>

Thanks for letting us know. As far as I'm concerned, I consider the
high-priority issues we've identified in our new features as blocker
material. And the one we're talking about here doesn't have any
translation or documentation impact that I can see (not even
screenshots). So, +1 from me.

Lets try to get many of these fixes in this week, so things can settle
down after .91.