Re: Code freeze break request for some regressions in PyGObject

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 18:27 +0200, Nacho wrote:
> I just did, tested with gedit and everything works as expected again.

Thanks!
Trusting you guys and giving r-t approval 1/2 to make Python plugins
hopefully work in Gedit and Totem. Even *in case* there are some issues
in the patch, still better than not having it work at all, I guess.

andre

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
>         On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:48 PM, john palmieri
>         <john j5 palmieri gmail com> wrote:
>         > >> libpeas had some interesting regression that only
>         happened with their
>         > >> use of g_object_new to instantiate PyGObject objects as
>         well as a
>         > >> regression with the handling of unions.  The patches are
>         here -
>         > >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659879 .  I'll
>         have nacho
>         > >> confirm that they work for him.  Without these patches
>         and a new
>         > >> tarball GEdit and Totem will be unable to load Python
>         plugins.
>         
>         I'd welcome a confirmation by nacho by responding to this
>         email and/or
>         in the bug report. CC'ing him.
>         
>         andre
>         --
>         mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
>         http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ignacio Casal Quinteiro

-- 
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com