On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 10:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Philip Withnall <philip tecnocode co uk> wrote: > > Hey, > > > > We don't want to make your lives miserable, but we're probably going to > > end up doing so. > > > > There are a number of big bugs still open against libfolks which we're > > working on as fast as we can in order to make gnome-contacts work for > > GNOME 3.2. However, there are probably still going to be some delays in > > getting all the necessary work done in libfolks and released, which is > > probably going to have knock-on effects on when gnome-contacts can be > > released. > > > > We're trying to get the API-changing stuff done first, so that > > gnome-contacts can depend on API-stable versions of folks, which can > > then be fixed later. > > Philip, > > thanks for the warning. > Is there a list of bugs we could watch to know how things are progressing ? At a broad level, there's: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=folks&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&target_milestone=folks-0.6.2 However, not all of those are critically important for gnome-contacts. The ones I'd say are important are: • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657065 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657141 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657783 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653728 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656689 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657635 • https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658002 It should be noted that it's quite possible that extra important bugs will come to light as Alex's work on gnome-contacts continues. (Hopefully not too many though.) Philip
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part