Re: GNOME 2.31.4 unstable tarballs due
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de>
- Cc: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.31.4 unstable tarballs due
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:02:12 -0400
> >
>
>> If things look catastrophically bad on Tuesday, I'll simple disable GSEAL again.
>
> As far as I understood, the release was supposed to require gtk+-3.0 and
> as I don't plan to support both gtk+-2.0 and gtk+-3.0 in my modules I
> don't think that is going to work. I mean, the GSEAL stuff is done -
> thanks Andre for annoying me so long to fix it.
>
Right, you should not try to support gtk2 and gtk3 at the same time.
And yes, we want to have a good number of modules ported over to gtk3
in 2.31.4. If there are some left that are still using gtk2, thats not
the end of the world, though.
What I was alluding to with my GSEAL comment is that a number of
modules have been ported to GTK+ before GSEAL was on by default in
2.90, and we may discover now that their port was not really complete
yet.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]