Re: Security gnome org handling
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: release-team <release-team gnome org>, board-list <board-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Security gnome org handling
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:31:02 +0200
Le jeudi 19 août 2010, à 15:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:28 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le vendredi 06 août 2010, à 15:13 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:09 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > > Am Freitag, den 06.08.2010, 12:08 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> > > > > Would the release-team be comfortable dealing with those e-mails
> > > >
> > > > Apart from the request itself: archives for release-team g o mailinglist
> > > > are public, but I assume emails sent to security g o should not be
> > > > immediately accessible for everybody on the web?
> > >
> > > My mistake, I believed that the mailing-lists' archives were for
> > > subscribers only. Is there a private version of the mailing-list, or do
> > > the release team have a private alias? If not, then we could setup
> > > another mailing-list for that purpose, no?
> >
> > There's no private version/alias of release-team. But we can setup one,
> > I guess.
> >
> > FWIW, I agree it makes sense to move security g o this way.
>
> I'll file a bug about creating a private mailing-list
> (release-team-private, or do we want to create a real security@
> mailing-list?)
My preference goes to a real security@ mailing list, since I don't think
the release team would use a private mailing list for anything else. So
it avoids confusion.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]