Re: [draft] Planning for GNOME 3.0



Le lundi 30 mars 2009, à 14:13 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Some quick feedback (I only had time to read this through once, so
> take it with a grain of salt):
> 
> > Some regressions were pointed out during the past few cycles: those should not be ignored and
> > we believe part of the reasons why they happened is that only a subpart of our community was
> > trying to move forward; having a community-wide focus should limit the number of regressions.
> 
> Fwiw, my expectation is not that the regression will be fewer, but I
> really, really hope that we can reduce
> the amount of controversy around the (unavoidable) regressions if
> there is a more concrete, larger goal
> that we are working towards.

Changed to:

Some regressions were pointed out during the past few cycles: those
should not be ignored and we believe part of the reasons why they
happened is that only a subpart of our community was trying to move
forward, which created some controversy; having a community-wide focus
should limit those controversies, and hence the regressions as felt by
the community.

(and I took into account your two other comments)

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]