Re: gtkmm: API-freeze break request: public Interface constructors.



Le mardi 25 septembre 2007, à 13:09 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> Dear release-team:
> 
> I would like to  make a small change to the code generated for our C++
> classes that wrap GInterfaces, such as Gtk::TreeModel, to make one of
> their constructors public instead of protected. This is a minor API
> addition which will break no applications. The API itself is very stable
> and already in use.
> 
> This is an example of such a constructor:
>   explicit TreeModel(GtkTreeModel* castitem);
> 
> It's usually only used by the class itself, or by derived classes. But I
> need to make it public to allow us to create C++ wrapper instances for
> classes that we do not wrap in C++. For instance, to allow us to get a
> Gtk::TreeModel* that wraps an instance of FunkySomeUnexpectedTreeModel.
> At the moment, our Glib::wrap(cobject) function returns NULL if it has
> no specific wrapper for a CObject that implements an interface. This
> would make the behaviour similar to that of widgets, for which we
> already return an instance of the most derived known type.
> 
> I'd rather not wait for GNOME 2.22 because I need to use this to fix a
> bug in libgdamm, so I can use one its features in Glom. It's likely to
> fix some odd errors for some other applications too.

I'm not quite sure that this counts as an API addition; it could be
considered as a bug fix, IMHO. Also, this sounds reasonable and looks
harmless, so here's one approval from me.

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]