Re: bump hal req to 0.5.10? (Was Re: Releases: gvfs 0.1.0, eel & nautlus 2.21.1)
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "David Zeuthen" <david fubar dk>
- Cc: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>, gnome-announce <gnome-announce-list gnome org>, gnome-vfs <gnome-vfs-list gnome org>, release-team gnome org, nautilus <nautilus-list gnome org>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Subject: Re: bump hal req to 0.5.10? (Was Re: Releases: gvfs 0.1.0, eel & nautlus 2.21.1)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:40:56 -0700
On Dec 21, 2007 4:18 PM, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 12:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > Do we need a newer hal? The one shipped with jhbuild (and official
> > external dep) is 0.5.9.
>
> Right, gvfs uses some new client-side API in libhal that uses a hash
> table so property lookup is O(1) instead of O(n).
>
> Since 0.5.10 was released Oct. 11 2007 and GNOME 2.22 is scheduled for
> sometime in 2008 I think we probably just want to bump the requirement
> to be hal 0.5.10. Most distros shipping 2.20 ship hal 0.5.10; everyone
> else, I think, has it in their development trees.
Sounds good to me.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
