Re: Requesting code change after freeze
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM>
- Cc: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Requesting code change after freeze
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:53:48 +0100
Hi,
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 �7:25 -0800, Brian Cameron a �it :
[snip]
> 1) The solution I would recommend is to add a new "gdmflexiserver
> --command" called "GET_CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE" so that gdmsetup can find
> out the name of the custom config file that is being used by the
> daemon. Then gdmsetup will modify the gdm.conf file and the
> custom.conf file will be ignored. The user can choose to migrate
> (or not) at their leisure.
[snip]
> 2) Perhaps a "nicer" solution would be for GDM to automagically migrate
> the users gdm.conf settings to the custom.conf file and not use the
> gdm.conf file at all. The problem with this approach is that some of
> the gdm.conf configuration settings (mainly the [server] and
> [server-foo] sections) are a bit tricky to migrate. This would make
> the migration code a bit tricky to implement and perhaps not an
> appropriate change late in the release cycle. This sort of migration
> could be added in the next release if people think that is a good
> idea.
>
> If the release team thinks this is the better approach, I think I
> can make this work. I just worry that any bugs in the code would
> cause the users more issues than doing nothing, and I would be more
> comfortable adding this sort of logic in 2.15/2.16 than now.
So, here's what I propose: go for solution 1 for 2.14 (consider this as
a private API), and fix it properly in 2.15, removing the private API.
Does it make sense?
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press�
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]