Re: [PATCH] for bad re-enterancy problem on slow machines



tir, 07,.03.2006 kl. 10.04 -0500, skrev Luis Villa:
> On 3/7/06, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 09:36 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > On 3/7/06, michael meeks <michael meeks novell com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 08:56 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > > > This makes me very nervous, given the timing, but clearly it is a bad
> > > > > problem, so we should probably commit it. Is there someone else (maybe
> > > > > Mark?) who is familiar with Bonobo and can double/triple-check the
> > > > > code just to be certain?
> > > >
> > > >         So - wrt. the code change they are somewhat banal - of course, the
> > > > debugging session behind that is more involved ;-)
> > > >
> > > >         basically just:
> > > >
> > > > +       char *copy = g_strdup (original);
> > > >         ...
> > > > -       foo (original);
> > > > +       foo (copy);
> > > > +       g_free (copy);
> > > >
> > > >         for 2 separate methods.
> > > >
> > > >         hard to see how it could go that wrong & it fixes some really nasty
> > > > login behavior on those old/slow machines we're encouraging people to
> > > > use by telling them how much faster the next release is :-)
> > >
> > > The path was 4K, so it seemed a bit bigger than that. Go ahead
> > > (assuming one other A-OK); if we could get a new tarball ASAP so
> > > Fedora, Ubuntu, OpenSuse, etc. can package and ship and test ASAP that
> > > would be great.
> > >
> > as soon as approved, I can make a release.
> 
> Maybe you can find someone on IRC? I'm in a meeting and can't round
> anyone up, but...
> Luis

2/2

Cheers
Kjartan





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]