Re: Delaying libgnomeui (or not)

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 8/23/06, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> Le mercredi 23 août 2006, à 09:26, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > Le mardi 22 août 2006 à 12:42 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm sorry that I haven't been able to fix all the bugs in the file
> > > chooser yet.  I have bugs at work that I need to fix first; my intention
> > > is to dedicate half a day to work bugs and half a day to file chooser
> > > stuff.
> >
> > These things happen, no need to apologize (and please, don't take my
> > previous mail as a personal attack, I was just a little upset because we
> > weren't notified at all).
> >
> > > Both gtk+ and libgnomeui will need changes.  Right now I'm writing the
> > > test suite that will help us know how libgnomeui is broken.  I expect to
> > > be done with the test suite today, and will fix the bugs tomorrow and
> > > the day after --- there are already some patches in Bugzilla that may
> > > help with this.
> > >
> > > After that I'll look at gtk+ itself.
> >
> > So, it means we will need also a GTK+ release, I guess ?
> >
> > Matthias, will you do a GTK+ release once file choosers changes are done
> > on GTK+ ?
> >
> > Guys, do you think we should delay 2.15.92 ?
>
> I don't think we should delay 2.15.92 too much. If the filechooser
> changes take too much time, then I suggest we do an additionnal release
> candidate, with only new versions of libgnomeui and gtk+ next week (and
> maybe tarballs of some modules that had some deep changes).
>
> IMHO, it's quite important to have the RC out soon to get bug reports
> soon (the fact that some distributions already ship most of 2.15.92
> helps mitigate the issue, but still, I'd prefer to get it out).
>
> What do other think?

I think what Vincent says makes sense.  :-)