Who rounds up the schedule?
- From: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- To: Gnome Release Team <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Who rounds up the schedule?
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:49:21 -0600
Hi,
Since http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning_2fTasks says the schedule
is owned by Murray or a release team newbie, and I'm the second newest
on the team, I decided it might be okay to get things kick-started[1].
Anyone want to make any modifications before presenting it to d-d-l?
I'd like to push a couple changes that I mentioned earlier:
- Specifying that the tarballs are due by 23:59 UTC the Monday specified
- Specifying that the freeze begins 23:59 UTC the Monday specified
Perhaps that's being nit-picky but it just seemed like it caused
confusion without that before (and an increasing number of late
releases); besides Monday evening just after 23:59 UTC is an optimal
time for me to begin testing. :)
Anyway, below I have the 2.11 development cycle, shifted forward 6 months except
for (1) the 2.12.1 release is 4 weeks instead of 5, (2) the 2.12.2 and
2.12.3 releases are scheduled, and (3) an extra week was added to
shift API/ABI, feature, and module freeze further away from Christmas
(due to lots of complaints in the 2.10 cycle about feature freeze
being just a little more than 2 weeks after Christmas, I think it'd be
better to lengthen the schedule by 1 week--the only other sane
alternative I see is to cut the schedule by 3 weeks to make feature
freeze 6 days before Christmas).
+ Number of weeks development between each release:
2.12.x Series | 2.13.x/2.14.0 Series
------------------+--------------------
2.12.1: 4 weeks | 2.13.1: 7 weeks
2.12.2: 8 weeks | 2.13.2: 3 weeks
2.12.3: 10 weeks | 2.13.3: 4 weeks
| 2.13.4: 3 weeks
| 2.13.5: 2 weeks
| Beta 1: 2 weeks
| Beta 2: 2 weeks
| RC1: 2 weeks
| 2.10.0: 2 weeks
+ Number of weeks between each freeze compared with other
development cycles - the numbers in parenthesis are the hard freeze
dates where there are slushy freezes.
| 2.13.x | 2.11.x | 2.9.x | 2.7.x | 2.5.x | 2.3.x
---------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------
API/ABI FREEZE | 14 (19) | 18 | 14 (17) | 14 (17) | 13 | 18
FEATURE/MOD. FREEZE | 19 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 18
UI FREEZE | 17 (21) | 16 (20) | 17 (19) | 17 (19) | 18 (22) | 26 (22)
STRING FREEZE | 17 (23) | 16 (22) | 17 (21) | 17 (21) | 18 (22) | 26
CODE FREEZE | 26 | 25 | 23 | 23 | 26 | 29
FINAL RELEASE | 27 | 26 | 25 | 25 | 28 | 31
+ Proposed calendar:
Wk September 2005
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3
4 (5) 6 (7) 8 9 10 RELEASE: GNOME 2.12.0
1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
2 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
3 25 26 27 28 29 30
October 2005
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1
4 2 (3) 4 (5) 6 7 8 RELEASE: GNOME 2.12.1 [xlats, bug & speed fixes]
5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [GNOME SUMMIT, 8-10]
6 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
7 23(24)25(26)27 28 29 RELEASE: GNOME 2.13.1 [new module proposal start]
8 30 31
November 2005
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5
9 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
10 13(14)15(16)17 18 19 RELEASE: GNOME 2.13.2
11 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
12 27(28)29(30) RELEASE: GNOME 2.12.2
December 2005
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3
13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
14 11(12)13(14)15 16 17 RELEASE: GNOME 2.13.3 [Slushy API and ABI freeze?]
15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
16 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
January 2006
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
17 1 (2) 3 (4) 5 6 7 RELEASE: GNOME 2.13.4 [String and UI change ann.]
18 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
19 15(16)17(18)19 20 21 RELEASE: GNOME 2.13.5 [A[PB]I, feature,
mod. freeze]
20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
21 29(30)31 RELEASE: GNOME 2.14.0 Beta 1 [UI Freeze]
February 2006
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
(1) 2 3 4
22 5 (6) 7 (8) 9 10 11 RELEASE: GNOME 2.12.3
23 12(13)14(15)16 17 18 RELEASE: GNOME 2.14.0 Beta 2 [String freeze]
24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
25 26(27)28
March 2006
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
(1) 2 3 4 RELEASE: GNOME 2.14.0 RC 1
26 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Hard code freeze]
27 12(13)14(15)16 17 18 RELEASE: GNOME 2.14.0! [End hard code freeze]
28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
29 26 27 28 29 30 31
April 2006
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1
30 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
31 9(10)11(12)13 14 15 RELEASE: GNOME 2.14.1
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Cheers,
Elijah
[1] Well, also I'm taking Murray's non-response to
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2005-September/msg00079.html,
which asked if he wanted/needed help with the doing the 2.14 schedule
due to him being busy, as a "yes".
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]