Re: ORBit2 release problems [Re: ORBit2 foo ...]

[Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>]

Le mardi 06 septembre 2005 à 13:26 +0100, Mark McLoughlin a écrit :
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 14:19 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> 
> > >   - Because most maintainers have been using jhbuild, and hence jhbuild
> > >     HEAD, tarballs released with orbit-idl generated code are using
> > >     ORBIT2_MAYBE_CONST and won't build with ORBit2-2.12.3
> > >
> > > 	Our options are:
> > >
> > >   1) Release ORBit2 from HEAD and use that for GNOME 2.12
> > >
> > >   2) Put ORBIT2_MAYBE_CONST on the gnome-2-10 branch and release
> > >      ORBit2-2.12.4
> > >
> > > 	(2) is probably the best option because ORBit2-2.12 is the better
> > > tested codebase.
> > >
> > > 	Comments anyone?
> > 
> > I'm okay with (2). However, Sébastien is saying that the ORBit-generated
> > files shouldn't be in the tarballs. Isn't he right?
> 
> 	Yeah, good point. We should fix that in gnome-vfs.
> 
> 	However, I don't think just fixing it in gnome-vfs would leave us
> confident enough that we're not not going to see further issues.
> 
> 	I'll go ahead backport the ORBIT2_MAYBE_CONST patch to gnome-2-10 and
> do a release from there.
> 
> 	If someone else from the release-team could ack this approach, I
> wouldn't feel so much like I'm breaking the rules - but we need the
> release ASAP so ...
Approval 2 of 2.

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
Mandriva