Re: API freeze break request

[Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>]

On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 15:41 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 18:08 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > I'm not happy about adding a whole
> > > class after an API freeze, because we'll have no chance to fix it if
> > > it's not perfect.
> > 
> > 	The python API is a direct mapping of the GConf one - I think it may
> > even be autogenerated from the headers. I didn't come up with the API
> > definition, it was already there ... I just implemented it ..
> 
> OK. I expected that they had to hand-craft their APIs a bit more than
> that.
> 
> If this is saving you considerable pain on an important project then
> I'll give you 1 approval. If it's just nice to have then I still don't
> feel it's worth the risk.

	Thanks Murray. Anyone else ? :-)

Cheers,
Mark.