Re: API freeze break request
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-release-team <release-team gnome org>, pygtk daa com au
- Subject: Re: API freeze break request
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:41:26 +0100
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 18:08 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > I'm not happy about adding a whole
> > class after an API freeze, because we'll have no chance to fix it if
> > it's not perfect.
>
> The python API is a direct mapping of the GConf one - I think it may
> even be autogenerated from the headers. I didn't come up with the API
> definition, it was already there ... I just implemented it ..
OK. I expected that they had to hand-craft their APIs a bit more than
that.
If this is saving you considerable pain on an important project then
I'll give you 1 approval. If it's just nice to have then I still don't
feel it's worth the risk.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]