Re: bonobo* ...

[michael meeks <michael meeks novell com>]

Hi Kjartan,

	So - I just did the 2 releases, 2.10 in each case - up-loaded them, and
ran install-module - only to find that you've just up-loaded some 2.10.0
tar.gz's today  and July 4th.

	There being no cvs tag, no mention of this in the ChangeLog or NEWS
(that I saw) I'm confused.

	Any chance you can unwind that, and/or preferably release some 2.10.1's
from HEAD libbonobo* so we're sure everything is in there ?

	Thanks,

		Michael.

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 18:27 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 17:06 +0100, michael meeks wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > 	So - it seems no-one bothered to either do a bonobo release or poke me
> > about it, and bonobo is essentially maintainerless.
> 
> You might call for a new maintainer - for instance, on d-d-l.
> 
> > 	However - there are a load of (mostly minor) fixes, new translations, &
> > bits in HEAD libbonobo[ui] and also Tor's Win32 work.
> > 
> > 	Also - I imagine that all developers have been jhbuilding against HEAD
> > bonobos for a long time now without significant incident.
> > 
> > 	Anyhow - I'd like to package this lot up & release, is that going to be
> > ok ?
> 
> Seems OK with me, given that it doesn't seem to have any new features or
> API, and has been tested from cvs. Thanks.
> 
-- 
 michael meeks novell com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot