Re: More UI Change for GDM
- From: Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>
- To: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- Cc: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, release-team gnome org, Calum Benson <Calum Benson sun com>, Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron sun com>
- Subject: Re: More UI Change for GDM
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:28:29 +0200
man, 08,.08.2005 kl. 08.56 -0400, skrev Luis Villa:
> Gah, sorry this didn't get replied to earlier, Brian- this looks fine
> to me if it looks OK with Shaun. Someone else weigh in, please?
>
You do for me I do for you :-)
I also think this looks ok, and in fact some of the changes here look
very familiar. Are these already in on HEAD and now awaiting inclusion
on the gnome-2-12 branch?
Cheers
Kjartan
> Luis
>
> On 8/5/05, Calum Benson <Calum Benson sun com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:18 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> > > Once again, I realize its past the UI freeze data for GNOME, but there
> > > is one more UI change that I think should be considered for GNOME 2.12.
> > > Calum is in the middle of doing a UI review for GDM, which I was hoping
> > > would get done in time for me to get these changes in before the freeze.
> >
> > Yep, sorry about that... had hoped to complete it early this week, but
> > circumstances have conspired to keep me out of the office until today.
> >
> > > He still isn't done with the review, but I'd like to address the issues
> > > that he highlighted:
> > >
> > > 1) Remove mnemonics from the tabs in gdmsetup, since you aren't supposed
> > > to use them according to the HIG.
> >
> > If you're doing that, you probably ought to remove the numbers as well,
> > as they're really only there to support the mnemonics, and just add a
> > bit more overall clutter.
> >
> > > 2) Change "Always disallow TCP connections to X server (disables all
> > > remote connections)" checkbox label to "Disallow TCP connections to
> > > Xserver (disabls xforwarding, but doesn not affect XDMCP". Calum
> > > highlighted that the previous message implied it also disabled
> > > XDMCP.
> >
> > Well, it did to a muppet like me, anyway :) A system administrator may
> > know differently, and one of the recommendations from the ongoing UI
> > review may be to separate the admin and end-user GUIs. But in the
> > meantime I'd agree some sort of clarification here is probably
> > worthwhile.
> >
> > > 3) Change "Include All Users" checkbox label to "Include All
> > > Users (Get Include user list from /etc/passwd, not appropriate
> > > if using NIS)".
> > >
> > > 4) Change "Face Browser" tab label to "Users", since the information
> > > on this tab doesn't just affect the face browser, but also controls
> > > which users can be selected for Automatic/Timed login. The following
> > > text is added to the top of this tab to make it more clear what this
> > > tab does:
> > >
> > > The Users tab specifies which users are visible to GDM. Users listed
> > > as Included will appear in the Face Browser if it is enabled in the
> > > "Security" tab and will also appear in the drop-down list for
> > > Automatic/Timed login in the "General" tab. Users listed as Excluded
> > > will not be displayed regardless of whether "Include All Users" is
> > > checked.
> > >
> > > 5) Fixed the sensitivies on the Users tab so that only the Include list
> > > is made insensitive when "Include All Users" is selected. Previously
> > > the Exclude list was also made insensitive, which is a bug since the
> > > Exclude list is used regardless of whether "Include All Users" is
> > > checked.
> > >
> > > Most of these changes are string changes, and its still before the
> > > String freeze. The only real UI change is fixing the sensitivity
> > > bug on the Users tab. Is it okay to put this fix into the 2.12
> > > branch? The fix is already in GDM2 CVS head, but not in the branch.
> > >
> > > There is another issue that Calum highlighted. According to the
> > > HIG a program shouldn't use a notebook with more than 6 tabs.
> > > gdmsetup uses 8 tabs. This issue will wait until a future
> > > release to get fixed, since I'd like Calum to finish the UI review
> > > before fixing this problem.
> >
> > Yes, it may be that if we do decide to separate the functionality into
> > two separate UIs for the two main user categories, the number of tabs on
> > each one becomes acceptable again. Can't promise that just yet, though.
> >
> > Cheeri,
> > Calum.
> >
> > --
> > CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
> > mailto:calum benson sun com Java Desktop System Group
> > http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771
> >
> > Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > release-team mailing list
> > release-team gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> >
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]