Re: Support for non-boxed types?

[Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu tomeuvizoso net>]

Boxing it is probably best, but I guess another alternative is to make
a fundamental type out of it?

Regards,

Tomeu

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:02, John Palmieri <johnp redhat com> wrote:
> No.  You would need to box it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Does g-i support non-boxed simple types, i.e. can one add annotations
>> to
>> indicate a types _new _free _copy functions?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> python-hackers-list mailing list
>> python-hackers-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
>
> --
> --
> John (J5) Palmieri
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> python-hackers-list mailing list
> python-hackers-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
>