Re: [Planner] In need of numbers...

[Gary Moffatt <gmoffatt gt rr com>]

Even then WBS numbers can not be sorted neatly by a regular sort - it should 
be easy to implement a 'hierarchical' sort as opposed to numeric or 
alphabetical. It truely amazes how popular this scheme is with some clients. 
(some are rabidly fanatical about WBS) The main benefit of WBS seems to be 
the ability to label or characterize various hierarchical levels and likewise 
it would be easy to set a dictionary of WBS titles so they would be available 
for graphics and reports. (that is '1.2.1' represents 3 levels, each with its 
own title)
 
On Friday 19 March 2004 13:22, lincoln phipps openmutual net wrote:
> Michael Rissmann wrote:
> > My problem is that I need the tasks numbered e.g. 1.1 task xy, 1.2 task
> > xyz, 1.2.1 subtask xyz.
>
> Thats a WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) as used by MS Project and others.
> I've raised a bugzilla to track this,
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136946
> Rgds,
> Lincoln
> > Michael

-- 
Registered Linux user #312657