On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 17:42 +0100, Richard Hult wrote: > The key name used for the setting should probably be changed to > something more descriptive. I don't have a suggestion right now though > (something like display_nonworking_time). I like that. > >>* With the height expanded, task field editing appears out of alignment > > > > I know it but I don't know to solve it, I think that we need a "gtk expert", > > there is one in the list that can help us ? > > There is no way around this, the task rows MUST be the same height as > the treeview rows. Not the other way around... I think we're talking about two different things. As far as I can tell, the treeview rows line up with the task rows. Its when you go to edit a task name or any other task value - the row height is enlarged but the edit box is not, so it looks like its floating at the top of the row (see attached pic). I think the edit boxes just need to be enlarged to fit the row height. > >>* Initial testing on vampire task - looks great. I'll do a deeper dive > >>into the code and test some more perhaps later today. > > I'd prefer some other term than vampire in the source code, did we ever > come up with anything else? Nothing that stuck. Here's some other ideas: preeminent, dominant I think I like dominant. You could refer to a dominant task overriding the resource allocation of the existing, or lower priority task. -- Kurt Maute <kurt maute us>
Attachment:
TaskEdit.png
Description: PNG image
