Re: mmapped icon foo ...
- From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>
- To: michael meeks novell com
- Cc: performance-list <performance-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: mmapped icon foo ...
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:09:40 -0500
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:52 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I was wondering; since [ in most cases ] now the icon data is shared
> across processes in the mmapped image cache; is it the case that we can
> mostly avoid loading the respective gdk-pixbuf loaders, and libjpeg /
> libpng etc. for most apps ? [ and hence their various dirty pages /
> linking slow-down etc. ].
>
> Strangely, when I look at small / large apps (zenity / gedit) - they
> seem to manage to pull in libpng and often libjpeg anyway. Any idea
> why ?
Oooh, interesting. We may very well be able to avoid loading the pixbuf
modules until later.
Can you play a bit to see when _gdk_pixbuf_load_module_unlocked() gets
called for a simple app like zenity or gedit? I *think* that's what
loads each module the first time it is needed.
Federico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]