Re: rpm-ostree vs comps
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: ostree-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: rpm-ostree vs comps
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:47:58 -0400
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016, at 06:48 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Another rpm-ostree question:
I've spent some time syncing the package list of the Fedora
workstation ostree image with the traditional live image. One ends up
with a ginormous package list (see
https://pagure.io/atomic-workstation-config/blob/master/f/fedora-atomic-workstation-default.json
)
which will be a pain to keep in sync with the package set on the live
image, which is specified via comps groups.
Have you considered allowing comps groups as input for the tree compose ?
Yeah, we should, it just drags in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libcomps
which isn't yet integrated into libhif.
It shouldn't be *hard* but it's not trivial either.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]