Re: [orca-list] Pluginsystem for Orca using libpeas
- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs igalia com>
- To: chrys <chrys linux-a11y org>, orca-list <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Pluginsystem for Orca using libpeas
- Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:12:58 +0200
Hey Chrys.
About to run out the door, but regarding this:
well, but what comes to my mind, if we wanna do this, how should we
behave in development?
sending every single patch for an huge undertaking like that could be
a
huge overhead for you to review. whats the best way here?
or should i continue my branch on github ( i can give you write
access
changes back then? just asking, because it might require a lot of
changes in height frequency.
what do you think?
I definitely don't want a zillion patches. And I think we'll want to do
it in logical chunks which then get merged as a single commit, or maybe
a few.
I think the first set should be things like simple user commands. Leave
the hello worlds and moving of screen reader messages out of the
picture for now. I think a good first set would be:
* date-time: two keybindings and one (I think) setting
* clipboard: one keybinding I assume, and maybe no settings?
* notifications list: which is more or less a mode once invoked
* mouse review: which needs to listen for events and sometimes know
something about where the object came from (e.g. Gecko).
I think/hope implementing/converting those into libpeas plugins should
give you the opportunity to discover things you might not have
considered and to figure out solutions. Because something I would like
to avoid is landing a bunch of changes and then going "oops" that won't
work. :)
Once those are fully functioning locally (your repo), then let's see
how ginormous a change it is and decide if we should merge it upstream
as a single commit, or broken up into a few.
Does that make sense?
Thanks again!
--joanie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]