Re: [orca-list] Processor or memory: which matters most with screen readers?
- From: "Glenn K0LNY" <glennervin cableone net>
- To: "Reece O'Bryan" <reece obryan icloud com>, <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Processor or memory: which matters most with screen readers?
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:44:41 -0600
It is my belief that RAM is most affected by using a screenreader, so if I
were balancing the two options, I would put more weight on more RAM.
For most computer needs, even a simple ARM processor is sufficient, but
large programs with a screenreader start eating up memory, especially if you
want to use a virtual machine.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reece O'Bryan via orca-list" <orca-list gnome org>
To: <orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 1:35 PM
Subject: [orca-list] Processor or memory: which matters most with screen
readers?
I understand that having a slow or old processor or having an insignificant
amount of RAM is definitely going to cause problems. However, does there
seem to be a sweet spot in which the machine has adequate processing power
and plenty of memory to be able to run orca and screen readers?
Thank you,
-Reece
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
GNOME Universal Access guide:
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]