Re: [orca-list] More flat review rewrite goodness: giant-table issues fixed

[kendell clark <coffeekingms gmail com>]

hi
This seems to work fantastic hear. I've been testing in seamonkey. I
don't have an inbox with 40000 messages but I do have several hundred at
a time and orca's flat review is much better than it was. Hard to argue
with improvement!
Thanks
Kendell Clark


Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> You should know the refrain by now ("I've still got a long way to go,
> but....") <smiles>
>
> I've just merged in some changes which should make invoking flat review
> in tables much more efficient. Especially in giant tables. My test case
> was a Thunderbird folder with over 40,000 messages. Before Orca would
> not respond for a really long time; now it responds in 2 seconds. And
> I've got other not-yet-merged changes that will make it faster than
> that. But I hope you'll agree that going from an uber-long time to 2
> seconds was worth committing in the meantime.
>
> To finish the familiar tune on a familiar note: Please pull master, let
> me know what you think, and especially if I've broken something.
>
> Thanks!
> --joanie
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org