Re: [orca-list] Orca readmap?

[MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <texou actux eu org>]

Thanks. Very interesting. I see there are few new features, why? Is it a 
lack of time issue? Is it because any new feature/setting would be a 
problem as one part of roadmap is moving the settings way on Orca? In 
other words, could we usefully develop new settings or features; or 
rather waiting for the end of migration of settings organization 
(gsettings, etc)?

Regards,

Le 06/11/2015 02:11, Joanmarie Diggs a écrit :
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca/Roadmap
>
> Patches are welcome and will be reviewed.
> --joanie
>
> On 11/05/2015 07:58 PM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Does an Orca roadmap exist? Or a guideline about Orca dev philosophy
> > (what are prio!ities, do you privilege bugfixes or dev of new features,
> > or compatibility with toolkits, etc)?
> >
> > 2. I'm wondering if, after discuss, you would accept if we would add new
> > features to Orca (e.g. capability to choose more widely the Orca key),
> > while you fix bugs and make Orca compatible with the hard Gecko, other
> > toolkits, etc. Would such patches be accepted? How are handled such
> > contributions if nhere are many?
> >
> > The interest, I think, is:
> > - we can develop on a "simple" language, e.g. Python, making Orca
> > improve (being aware that other things are involved such as
> > speech-dispatcher and xbrlapi);
> > - you can focus on more difficult tasks which require more experience
> > with Orca code, and require to know the role of at-spi, toolkit, etc. to
> > know what to do, what to ask to apps, etc.
> >
> > Note: new features are discussed here, to know their interest, the
> > interest Orca can to handle itself them, and if it could be a hard work.
> > We won't develop, patch without pre-discuss.
> >
> > Thanks for your answers.


--
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL

HYPRA, progressons ensemble

Tél.: 01 84 73 06 61

Mail: contact hypra fr

Site Web: http://hypra.fr