Re: [orca-list] Announcing Orca v3.7.4



Hello,
I would take PKGBUILD files from existing packages as a base and modify it so it will compile newer versions. I think this part is clear to me. However now I am still curious whether this is a lot of work and what packages do I need to tweak PKBUILD scripts for, build and install this way.
Python3 is already in one of the repos I think.
If I take py-atspi and orca PKBUILD scripts will I be able to pull other dependencies automatically or is there more into it? Or if this is doable perhaps we can upload git versions of these packages into AUR. Preferrably I would like to build the packages so I can go back or do whatever if something goes wrong. I have found this packaging system really avesome to use.

Greetings

Peter



On 15.01.2013 14:12, Josà Vilmar EstÃcio de Souza wrote:
No, you don't need to install gnome 3-7, at least until now. You need to install python3 using pacman.

You can compile orca directly from git or create a package using a PKGBUILD.

Actually I have orca 3.7.4 installed as a package and another version compiled from git to test new commits.

I am also using at-spi2-core version 3.7.3.

I can send some instructions on how to compile orca and at-spi2-core using PKGBUILD. The process is relatively easy since you already are using arch.


On 01/15/2013 08:52 AM, Peter VÃgner wrote:
Hello,
I am also using arch for some two months. I have upgraded my system
three times without ruining it so far.
However I am curious do I need to install gnome 3.7 from testing or can
I install python3, manually install a lot of dependencies and test orca
on a gnome 3.6?
I am interested on how you are doing it Josee.
Do you have PKBUILD scripts for every single dependency or are just
using ./configure & make & make install where possible ?

Greetings

Peter


On 15.01.2013 10:57, Josà Vilmar EstÃcio de Souza wrote:
I think that even with ubuntu 12.10 you don't,.
What I did was move to arch, as suggested in this message.
The problem is that the arch requires the user to have some knowledge
of the system and some settings are not as automated as in ubuntu.
Moreover the existing documentation is very good in my opinion.
Thanks.


On 01/15/2013 07:41 AM, Thomas Ward wrote:
Hi Krishnakant,

Quick answer is you don't. Ubuntu 12.04 is too far out of date to run
Orca 3.7.4. Basically, if you want it we are talking about compiling
Gnome 3.6, possibly Gnome 3.7, upgrading to Python 3, and building all
the Python dependencies Orca needs. If you want bleeding edge builds
of Orca pick a different distribution like Arch which has a rolling
release for Gnome etc which is better for development and bleeding
edge testing of Gnome. Ubuntu while decent for a stable day to day
distribution is not great for bleeding edge testing of Gnome and Orca
without doing a lot of custom compiling and installing everything
yourself.

Cheers!

On 1/15/13, Krishnakant Mane <krmane gmail com> wrote:
Great work.
So what do I need to compile this version on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bit.
I am getting an error on GTK+ not properly installed.
It asks for a version which seems to be not there.
Kindly help.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp









[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]