Re: Orca trace2html results
- From: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- To: Lynn Monsanto <Lynn Monsanto Sun COM>
- Cc: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Orca trace2html results
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:50:43 -0500
Hi Lynn:
Thanks for taking a look!
optimistic about the coverage. For example, the graph shows that the
where_am_I module has 10% coverage, but all the where_am_I.py code is
highlighted, except for the method declarations.
Interesting. Do you mean "highlighted" as in "red, no coverage"? If
so, could this mean that there is some coverage (i.e., an import done
somewhere read all the method declarations), but none of the methods
were executed?
Another thing that
makes me suspect that trace2html is overly optimistic, is that
coverage.py indicated that 30% of the StarOffice module was covered, but
trace2html says that the coverage is 40%. I'll look into this.
One thing to think about might be "lines in the module" vs. "excutable
statements in the module". The difference might be attributable to both
comments and single statements that are broken over multiple lines. I'm
not sure how coverage vs. trace2html handle these things and/or if they
handle them differently.
Thanks!
Will
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]