Re: Regression fix committed to svn
- From: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- To: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- Cc: ORBit2 <orbit-list gnome org>, Michael Meeks <mmeeks novell com>
- Subject: Re: Regression fix committed to svn
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:23:42 +0200
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:54 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Qua, 2007-07-25 at 14:38 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo and Michael,
> >
> > I've convinced myself that I should commit as trunk+patch is much better
> > than what is in trunk right now.
> >
> > [Gustavo] I would like to suggest a new release (2.14.9?) if your test
> > boxes are happy with revision 2011.
>
> I was just testing this. Before your today's commits, the test still
> fails:
>
> Running timeout server...
> Running timeout client...
> =======================================================================
> *** Starting GIOP timeout tests ***
> =======================================================================
> Provoking timeout exception... Timeout_ping():
> IDL:omg.org/CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0
> Shutting down GIOP timeout tests... CORBA_Object_release():
> IDL:omg.org/CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0
> =======================================================================
> *** Some GIOP timeout tests failed ***
> =======================================================================
> FAIL: timeout.sh
>
>
> After your commits it works OK:
>
> Running timeout server...
> Running timeout client...
> =======================================================================
> *** Starting GIOP timeout tests ***
> =======================================================================
> Provoking timeout exception... OK
> Testing reacquired connection with no server delay... OK
> Testing with small server delay... OK
> Provoking timeout exception... OK
> Testing reacquired connection with no server delay... OK
> Shutting down GIOP timeout tests... OK
> =======================================================================
> *** All GIOP timeout tests successful ***
> =======================================================================
> PASS: timeout.sh
>
>
> Whatever you did, goo work. I'm pretty happy with it now :)
Thanks a lot. I'm happy that it works ;-)
> Although
> it would be better to get rid of the "Starting GIOP timeout test"
> messages; no reason why these particular unit tests need more prominence
> than any other unit tests :)
Yes, no more need to make this particular test case stand out. Fix
committed (rev 2012).
> I'll make a release as soon as I get a free slot of hacking time; maybe
> tonight.
Great, thanks a lot!
Best regards,
jules
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]